SECTOR INSIGHT

Why the way we talk about early childhood education and care matters

Join the conversation

We welcome different perspectives. If this article sparked a question, challenged your thinking, or you have an experience to share, we would love to hear from you. Email us at hello@earlyyearstalent.com.

Date of publication: July 2026 Reading time: 6 minutes

The language used across early childhood education and care influences how educators’ work is understood, how candidates judge an employer and how families view the profession. Getting it right means choosing words that accurately reflect educators’ qualifications, responsibilities and professional judgement—and using them consistently across recruitment, communication and everyday practice.

For generations, the work of early childhood educators has often been framed around basic care and supervision. That narrow view overlooks the qualifications, professional knowledge and judgement involved in supporting children’s learning, development, safety and wellbeing.

Early childhood educators draw on years of formal education, workplace training and professional experience. Throughout each day, we observe learning, plan and extend meaningful experiences, build secure relationships, recognise risk, partner with families and make informed decisions about children’s individual needs.

Early Childhood Australia’s 2025 terminology guide provides a nationally endorsed reference for using consistent, affirmative and accurate terminology across the sector.

Kids → Children
Child care worker → Educator or early childhood teacher
Centre → Service or setting
Day care → Early childhood education and care service
Industry → Sector or profession

These choices give families, candidates, policymakers and the wider community a clearer picture of what happens inside an early childhood service. Each change helps restore respect to a profession whose contribution has been underestimated for far too long.

Recent Australian research shows why these choices matter. Brocki, Phillips and Price (2026) found that political and media language shapes how the early childhood workforce is valued and where responsibility for quality and safety is placed. Their analysis identified the repeated use of “childcare workers” as a form of professional downgrading that pushes education, pedagogy and ethical responsibility out of view. It also showed how public language can focus attention on individual educators while staffing, funding, workforce stability and other structural conditions receive far less scrutiny.

Language also signals who belongs

Inclusive language helps educators, candidates and families see themselves in a service’s communication. Expressions such as “mums and dads”, “he or she” and “the girls in the room” make assumptions about gender, family structure or the people suited to early childhood work.

More inclusive alternatives include “families and carers”, the singular “they”, and role titles such as “educator” or “early childhood teacher”. Recruitment language should also replace assumptions about personality, age or gender with the capabilities the role requires. “Young, energetic and naturally maternal”, for example, can become “skilled at building secure relationships, responding to children’s cues and maintaining an engaging learning environment”.

The aim is clear, accurate language that welcomes a diverse workforce while keeping professional capability at the centre.

The 15-minute Language and Respect Audit

Choose five documents your service already uses:

a current job advertisement
a position description
the careers page on your website
a recent communication to families
an induction or orientation document

Review each document using the following three questions.

1. Does it name the profession accurately?

Check every role title, service description and reference to the sector. Look for broad or outdated language such as “childcare worker”, “room staff”, “day care”, “industry”, “looking after children” and “helping in the room”. Replace each term with language that accurately identifies the role and its responsibilities.

2. Does it make professional capability visible?

Highlight every sentence that describes what the person is expected to do. Words such as “bubbly”, “energetic”, “flexible”, “passionate” and “great with kids” reveal very little about professional capability.

A stronger description identifies the knowledge and judgement required:

building secure and respectful relationships with children
planning and extending play-based learning
contributing to observations and documentation
partnering with families
recognising and responding to risk
reflecting on practice with colleagues
applying approved learning frameworks

3. Would an educator recognise their work in the description?

Give the document to an educator and ask: “Does this sound like the work you actually do?” Their answer will reveal what the document has missed.

Educators may identify responsibilities that have become almost invisible because they happen every day: managing transitions, noticing changes in behaviour, adapting experiences, supporting inclusion, guiding interactions, communicating with families and making constant decisions about safety and learning. Add that work back into the description.

4. Does the language signal that everyone belongs?

Review the document for assumptions about gender, age, family structure or the type of person suited to early childhood work. Look for expressions such as “mums and dads”, “he or she”, “the girls in the room”, “young and energetic” or “naturally maternal”.

Replace these assumptions with language that describes people accurately and focuses on the capabilities required. Use “families and carers”, the singular “they”, and professional role titles such as “educator” or “early childhood teacher”. In recruitment materials, describe observable capabilities such as building secure relationships, responding to children’s cues, collaborating with families and sustaining an engaging learning environment.

Ask one final question: could an educator, candidate or family read this document without feeling that the service has already decided who belongs?

Score each document

Rating	What it means
Accurate	The language reflects the role, qualifications and professional work clearly.
Incomplete	The terminology is broadly correct, but significant knowledge or responsibility remains invisible.
Outdated	The document relies on diminishing terminology, personality clichés or descriptions centred mainly on supervision.

Any document rated incomplete or outdated becomes part of the service’s communication review. The aim is consistency across the website, job advertisements, position descriptions and everyday leadership language.

What stronger language sounds like

Language that hides the work	Language that makes the work visible
“We need a bubbly childcare worker who loves kids.”	“We are seeking a qualified educator who can build secure relationships, contribute to a thoughtful play-based program and work collaboratively with families and colleagues.”
“The children were just playing outside.”	“Through outdoor play, children tested ideas, negotiated with one another and extended their problem-solving and physical confidence.”
“Louisa looks after the babies.”	“Louisa is an infant and toddler educator who creates responsive routines, secure relationships and developmentally appropriate learning experiences.”

Leadership takeaway

USE THIS RULE

Accurate language names the role, makes professional capability visible and sounds true to the educators who perform the work.

Improving professional language in early childhood education and care restores visibility to the knowledge, judgement and responsibility educators bring to their work. Combined with fair conditions and professional support, it strengthens the respect the profession has earned.

Related resources

Continue exploring practical guidance, salary insights and recruitment resources designed to help early childhood services build stronger, more stable teams.

2026 Early Childhood Salary Guide

Current salary benchmarks for educators, teachers, Educational Leaders and Centre Directors across Australia.

Knowledge Centre

Explore practical articles, workforce insights and recruitment guidance for the early childhood sector.

Recruitment for employers

Learn how our assessment process helps identify educators and leaders who strengthen teams over the long term.

Discuss your next appointment

Planning your next permanent appointment? Speak with us about your recruitment needs.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Here is a snapshot of the most common questions we’re asked. If you do not see your question here, feel free to reach out—our team is always happy to help.

Why does professional language in early childhood education and care matter?

Language influences how educators’ expertise, responsibilities and professional judgement are understood. It also signals whether a service sees educators as skilled professionals or primarily as people who supervise children. The words used in job advertisements, position descriptions and everyday leadership can therefore shape candidate expectations, professional identity and organisational credibility.

Should services stop using the term “childcare” completely?

Context determines the most accurate term. “Childcare” remains embedded in legislation, funding language, common search behaviour and some official program names. When describing professional practice, roles or service culture, “early childhood education and care” usually represents the work more completely. Official titles and familiar search terms should remain accurate and useful to families.

What is the difference between an early childhood educator and an early childhood teacher?

An early childhood educator may hold an approved Certificate III, Diploma or equivalent qualification. An early childhood teacher holds an approved teaching qualification. Use each title according to the person’s qualification, role and any applicable registration obligations.

Is “service” always better than “centre”?

“Service” is usually more inclusive because early childhood education and care occurs across centre-based services, family day care, outside school hours care and other settings. “Centre” may still be accurate when referring specifically to a physical centre or where it forms part of an established role title. Accuracy matters more than mechanically replacing every occurrence.

Why can the phrase “just playing” be problematic?

The word “just” can make children’s play—and the educator’s professional contribution—sound incidental. Play can involve inquiry, language, negotiation, physical development, creativity and problem-solving. Strong communication explains what educators observed, how they responded and why the experience mattered without turning every family update into a thesis.

How does language affect early childhood recruitment?

Candidates use language to judge role quality and workplace culture. An advertisement centred on being “bubbly”, “flexible” and “passionate” may obscure the capability actually required. Stronger advertisements describe professional judgement, relationships, pedagogy, collaboration, child-safe practice and the support available to perform the role well.

Can changing terminology improve educator retention?

Consistent professional recognition can contribute to belonging, identity and workplace credibility. Its effect is strongest when paired with fair pay, manageable workload, safe practice, capable leadership and working conditions that reflect the professional expectations being described.

Where should a service begin its language audit?

Start with five documents candidates, educators and families regularly encounter: a job advertisement, position description, careers page, family communication and induction resource. Check role-title accuracy, capability language, explanations of play, culturally respectful terminology and whether employment practices support the expectations being described.

Who should be responsible for improving organisational language?

Leadership should own the standard, but the review should include educators and teachers who perform the work being described. Recruitment, marketing and administration staff also need the same terminology guidance. Otherwise, the website, job advertisements and daily workplace conversations will continue telling different stories.

How should services approach culturally respectful terminology?

Ask Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander individuals, families and communities how they wish to be referred to. Use “Aboriginal” and “Torres Strait Islander” in full, and seek appropriate local advice before using First Languages or culturally specific terminology. Respectful practice is grounded in relationship, consultation and permission.

How often should recruitment and communication language be reviewed?

Review the core documents at least annually and whenever a role, qualification requirement, approved framework, organisational structure or regulatory obligation changes. Job advertisements should also be checked before each campaign rather than copied indefinitely from an increasingly archaeological shared folder.

How can leaders tell whether a language change is genuine or cosmetic?

Apply the 15-minute Language and Respect Audit. Genuine change appears consistently across job advertisements, position descriptions, family communication, induction documents and everyday leadership. Educators should also recognise their real work in the language being used.