Educator turnover remains one of the most pressing operational challenges for Australian childcare services. Persistent shortages, rising compliance pressure and increased workloads have created a workforce landscape where hiring alone no longer solves stability issues. Yet some services maintain strong, consistent teams despite these pressures. They do not merely advertise more or pay marginally better; they deliberately create environments that high‑quality educators choose to stay in.
Why some childcare services keep educators longer
In late 2024, a Melbourne long day care centre replaced three educators within six months. Families noticed a stream of unfamiliar faces, and the remaining staff absorbed extra pressure. Exit discussions revealed something other than pay or sector‑wide shortages; new educators felt unclear about expectations, unsupported during induction and misaligned with the team’s communication style. This pattern is common in services where leadership expectations are inconsistent, onboarding is ad hoc and cultural fit is overlooked. By contrast, high-performing centres invest in leadership consistency, transparent recruitment processes and structured induction.
Leadership consistency as a recruitment advantage
Educators assess potential workplaces not just on wages but on day‑to‑day predictability. When expectations vary between rooms, communication changes depending on who is on shift, and decision‑making feels erratic; morale suffers.
Services that prioritise leadership consistency foster trust and calm: weekly check-ins, documented communication protocols and shared practice frameworks help new team members integrate. These deliberate structures reduce confusion and improve recruitment because existing educators speak positively to peers.
Recruiting for alignment, not urgency
Under staffing strain, services are tempted to recruit anyone who meets the minimum qualifications. Yet reactive hiring often creates greater disruption later. High-performing centres slow down to explore alignment during interviews. They ask candidates how they build relationships with children, respond to feedback and collaborate within stable teams. They are transparent about documentation expectations, communication style and the pace of the environment so candidates can self-select out if it is not a match. This approach may narrow the applicant pool but reduces costly rehiring cycles.
Educator wellbeing as a competitive advantage
For years, wellbeing initiatives were viewed as optional extras. Today, educator wellbeing influences recruitment and retention outcomes. Experienced educators increasingly weigh emotional sustainability, workload and leadership support alongside salary. Services that protect breaks, maintain realistic programming expectations and respond calmly under pressure earn reputational advantages. At one Victorian service, leadership reviewed workloads, introduced protected break coverage and invested in mentoring rather than expecting seasoned educators to absorb all new staff support. Morale improved, collaboration strengthened and recruitment conversations became easier because candidates noticed a calmer atmosphere.
Practical strategies services can implement
Realistic job previews:
When interviewing, go beyond generic role descriptions. Describe a typical day in the room, including documentation requirements, programming expectations and peak periods. Invite candidates to observe the room (if appropriate) so they can see the pace, teamwork and educator interactions. Provide a “day‑in‑the‑life” document that outlines routines, educator–child ratios and communication protocols. Encourage candidates to ask questions and reflect on whether the environment suits their preferred style.
Structured onboarding
Develop a 90‑day onboarding plan. Assign a mentor or “buddy” for new educators and schedule weekly check‑ins during probation. Include an orientation session covering centre philosophy, documentation practices, safety procedures and communication channels. Offer dedicated time for observation and reflection in the first weeks. Review progress milestones at the end of each month and adjust support as needed.
Operational predictability:
Use a consistent roster and communicate schedules in advance. Standardise daily routines and document them so every educator understands expectations. Hold quick daily or weekly huddles to discuss staffing changes, emergent issues and priorities. Use clear communication channels (for example, a shared messaging platform or noticeboard) so that everyone receives the same information. Encourage room leaders to be visible and available during high‑pressure periods.
Balanced workloads
Monitor the distribution of tasks so experienced educators do not shoulder all the mentoring and behavioural responsibilities. Rotate duties like nappy changes, documentation and programming among team members. Provide float educators or relief staff during busy times. Build protected planning or non‑contact time into the roster so educators can focus on documentation and preparation without interruption.
Early feedback loops:
Create regular opportunities for educators to share feedback before issues become acute. This can include monthly one‑on‑one meetings, anonymous suggestion boxes or brief reflective sessions at the end of shifts. Encourage leaders to ask “What’s currently making your role harder?” and respond promptly. Document and track themes from these conversations so systemic issues can be addressed.
Case study: Educator waitlist in Melbournes Eastern suburbs
One Early Years Talent client in the Easern suburbs of Melbourne applied these principles with remarkable results. Leadership stopped “selling” roles to fill vacancies quickly. Instead, they explained the centre’s collaborative culture, reflective practice expectations and high accountability. Some candidates withdrew, but those who joined were committed. New educators were given structured mentoring, and wellbeing initiatives (such as protected break coverage and realistic programming expectations) were introduced. They also introduced some fun ideas, like making fresh juices for the on-site staff every Wednesday. Within eighteen months, turnover fell dramatically and the centre developed something rare in early childhood education: a waitlist of qualified educators wanting to join. Existing staff proudly recommended their workplace, and recruitment conversations shifted from persuasion to selection. This example illustrates how intentional leadership and alignment can transform educator retention.
As workforce pressures continue across Australia, stability itself is quietly becoming one of the sector’s strongest competitive advantages.
Families notice continuity.
Children benefit from consistent relationships.
Educators remain in psychologically sustainable teams longer.
And importantly, recruitment becomes easier when services develop reputations for professional trust, thoughtful leadership, and operational consistency.
Excellent-rated early childhood services do not simply demonstrate strong educational practice.
Many appear to demonstrate something equally important:
The ability to create organisational environments where educators can genuinely remain, grow, and thrive long term.
In summary
As workforce pressures continue across Australia, stability is becoming one of the sector’s strongest competitive advantages.
Services that deliberately combine transparent recruitment, predictable leadership and genuine wellbeing support place themselves in a stronger position to attract and retain skilled educators.
Instead of chasing quick fixes, high-performing centres build cultures where educators can remain, grow and thrive over the long term.
Related resources
Continue exploring practical guidance, salary insights and recruitment resources designed to help early childhood services build stronger, more stable teams.
2026 Early Childhood Salary Guide
Current salary benchmarks for educators, teachers, Educational Leaders and Centre Directors across Australia.
Knowledge Centre
Explore practical articles, workforce insights and recruitment guidance for the early childhood sector.
Recruitment for employers
Learn how our assessment process helps identify educators and leaders who strengthen teams over the long term.
Discuss your next appointment
Planning your next permanent appointment? Speak with us about your recruitment needs.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Here is a snapshot of the most common questions we’re asked. If you do not see your question here, feel free to reach out—our team is always happy to help.
Why do some childcare services experience higher educator turnover than others?
Turnover is rarely due to pay alone. Services with unclear leadership expectations, inconsistent onboarding or poor cultural fit tend to lose educators faster. High-performing centres invest in leadership consistency, transparent recruitment and structured induction so educators feel supported and aligned with the team.
What does “leadership consistency” mean in early childhood settings?
Leadership consistency refers to predictable expectations, communication and decision-making across rooms and shifts. When educators experience calm, organised leadership, they feel safer to navigate high-pressure days. Weekly check-ins, shared practice frameworks and documented communication protocols are simple ways to build this consistency.
How can we align recruitment with our service culture?
Instead of hiring reactively, use interviews to explore how candidates build relationships with children, respond to feedback and collaborate within stable teams. Be transparent about documentation expectations, communication style and the pace of daily operations. This mutual discovery helps both parties determine fit and reduces rehiring cycles.
What are some practical strategies to improve educator retention?
Many effective practices are manageable even for smaller services. These include realistic job previews during recruitment, structured onboarding with regular check-ins and mentoring, proactive rostering and clear communication, and providing float support or protected planning time so experienced educators don’t carry disproportionate load.
How does educator wellbeing influence recruitment and retention?
Wellbeing is no longer a “nice to have”—it directly influences who applies and who stays. Educators increasingly weigh emotional sustainability, workload and leadership support alongside salary. Services known for protecting breaks, maintaining realistic workloads and responding calmly under pressure build reputational advantages that attract and retain quality educators.
What is the impact on existing staff when retention isn’t a priority?
When educators leave frequently, remaining staff absorb more emotional and operational pressure, which can lead to burnout. Experienced educators often become the default support system for new hires, carrying disproportionate mentoring and behavioural loads. Without deliberate support, this can erode morale and eventually cause further turnover.
Do we need to increase salaries to improve educator retention?
Competitive wages matter, but retention hinges on more than salary alone. High-performing services emphasise leadership consistency, transparent recruitment and structured induction so educators feel aligned and supported. Improving these factors often has a greater impact on retention than marginal pay increases.
How does educator turnover impact occupancy and enrolment?
Families value continuity of relationships. High turnover leads to a constant stream of new faces, which can undermine parent confidence and cause families to seek more stable services. Services with consistent teams build reputations for trust and continuity; this stability quietly becomes a competitive advantage in attracting and retaining both educators and families.
Does educator retention affect children’s learning and development?
Yes. Consistent relationships are critical for secure attachments and high‑quality learning. When educators remain longer, they build deeper bonds with children and families, provide continuity of care and create a calmer learning environment. Frequent turnover disrupts routines and can increase anxiety for children, which parents notice and often comment on.
How can small services improve retention with limited resources?
Stability does not require large financial investments. Many effective retention practices—such as realistic job previews, structured onboarding, clear communication and proactive scheduling—are practical and low‑cost. Small services can also protect breaks, ensure workloads are realistic and create regular feedback loops so concerns are addressed early. These incremental changes collectively improve the daily experience for educators, leading to stronger retention over time.
Further Reading & References
The information presented in this article is informed by current research, government guidance and recognised sector literature. The references below are provided for readers who wish to explore the topic in greater depth.
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2025). Guide to the National Quality Framework. Available here.
Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority (2025). National Quality Standard. Available here.
McMullen, M.B., Lee, M.S., McCormick, K. & Choi, Y. (2020) Early childhood professional wellbeing as a predictor of educator retention and classroom quality. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(6), 721–730.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021) Starting Strong VI: Supporting meaningful interactions in early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available here.
Thorpe, K., Staton, S., Houen, S. & Beatton, T. (2020) Identifying predictors of retention and professional wellbeing of the early childhood education workforce in a time of change. Journal of Educational Change, 21(4), 623–647.
Totenhagen, C.J., Hawkins, S.A. & Casper, D.M. (2022) Workforce instability and educator wellbeing in early childhood education settings. Children and Youth Services Review, 138, 106510.
Zinsser, K.M., Christensen, C.G. & Torres, L. (2021) She’s supporting them; who’s supporting her? Preschool centre-level social‑emotional supports and teacher wellbeing. Journal of School Psychology, 86, 83–99.
Publishd July 2026